Chapter 5.11: The Running Locking Horizontal Mattress Suture

Running looped mattress suture

This is a modification of the running horizontal mattress suture, an everting technique used for closure and epidermal approximation. It is best used as a secondary layer when deeper sutures have been previously placed. This technique may be particularly useful in the context of atrophic skin, as the broader anchoring bites may help limit tissue tear-through. This locking variation confers two advantages over the traditional horizontal mattress suture: (1) better ease of suture removal, and (2) improved wound-edge apposition.

With all techniques, it is best to use the thinnest suture possible in order to minimize the risk of track marks and foreign-body reactions. Suture choice will depend largely on anatomic location and the goal of suture placement.

On the face, a 6-0 or 7-0 monofilament suture may be used, though fast-absorbing gut may be used on the eyelids and ears to obviate the need for suture removal; in these cases, standard running horizontal mattress sutures are probably preferable to their locking counterparts. When the goal of the running locking horizontal mattress suture placement is solely to encourage wound-edge eversion, fine-gauge suture material may be used on the extremities as well. Otherwise, 5-0 monofilament suture material may be used if there is minimal tension, and 4-0 monofilament suture is useful in areas under moderate tension where the goal of suture placement is relieving tension as well as epidermal approximation. In select high-tension areas, 3-0 monofilament suture may be utilized as well.

1. The needle is inserted perpendicular to the epidermis, approximately one-half the radius of the needle distant to the wound edge. This will allow the needle to exit the wound on the contralateral side at an equal distance from the wound edge by simply following the curvature of the needle.

2. With a fluid motion of the wrist, the needle is rotated through the dermis, taking the bite wider at the deep margin than at the surface, and the needle tip exits the skin on the contralateral side.

3. The needle body is grasped with surgical forceps in the left hand and pulled upward with the surgical forceps as the body of the needle is released from the needle driver.

4. The suture material is then tied off gently, with care being taken to minimize tension across the epidermis and avoid overly constricting the wound edges. Only the loose end of suture is trimmed.

5. Moving proximally toward the surgeon, the needle is again inserted perpendicular to the epidermis, approximately one-half the radius of the needle distant to the wound edge.

6. With a fluid motion of the wrist, the needle is rotated through the dermis, taking the bite wider at the deep margin than at the surface, and the needle tip exits the skin on the contralateral side.

7. The needle body is grasped with surgical forceps in the left hand and pulled upward with the surgical forceps as the body of the needle is released from the needle driver.

8. The needle is then reloaded in a backhand fashion and inserted at 90 degrees perpendicular to the epidermis proximal (relative to the surgeon) to its exit point on the same side of the incision line as the exit point. Importantly, a loop of suture material is left protruding from the wound from where the needle exited on the prior throw to where it enters on this throw.

9. The needle is rotated through its arc, exiting on the right side of the wound (relative to the surgeon) in a mirror image of steps (6) and (7).

10. The needle is then passed under the loop of suture material on the contralateral side.

11. Steps (5) through (10) are then sequentially repeated, moving proximally toward the surgeon.

12. The suture material is then tied off gently, with care being taken to minimize tension across the epidermis and avoid overly constricting the wound edges (Figures 5-11A, 5-11B, 5-11C, 5-11D, 5-11E, 5-11F, 5-11G).

The running locking technique confers two important advantages over the traditional running horizontal mattress suture. First, the standard horizontal mattress suture does not typically permit the same degree of wound-edge apposition as can be accomplished with other transepidermal sutures, since the everting effect of the suture technique may even be associated with a small degree of gaping at the center of the horizontal mattress suture. Locking the suture material brings the knot, as well as the two parallel external rows of suture, to the center of the wound, thus improving wound-edge approximation.

Second, suture removal with the standard running horizontal mattress technique may be challenging, particularly if sutures are left in situ for an extended period of time and some of the suture material has been overgrown by the healing epidermis, as the knot may be buried in the context of a ridged everted repair. Bringing the knot, along with the parallel rows of external suture material, centrally with the locking technique allows the knot to be more easily grasped at the time of suture removal.

As with most transepidermal techniques, it is important to enter the epidermis at 90 degrees, allowing the needle to travel slightly laterally away from the wound edge before fully following the curvature of the needle when utilizing this technique. This will allow for maximal wound eversion and accurate wound-edge approximation.

As with the simple interrupted suture, care should be taken to avoid skimming the needle superficially beneath the epidermis. This results from failing to enter the skin at a perpendicular angle and to follow the curvature of the needle. This may result in wound inversion as the tension vector of the shallow bite pulls the wound edges outward and down.

This variation has a disadvantage when compared with the standard running horizontal mattress technique, in that locking each throw means that there is suture material passing over the incision line with every throw. As suture material passing over the center of the wound may be associated with track-like scarring, this disadvantage needs to be weighed carefully against any perceived advantages of this technique.

Moreover, particularly if the suture material is under significant tension, structures deep to the defect may be constricted. This can lead to necrosis due to vascular compromise or even, theoretically, superficial nerve damage. These concerns are more acute with the running locking horizontal mattress suture than with the simple running suture, since the wide arc of the suture material and its horizontal component incorporate more skin and underlying structures, thus increasing the risk of strangulation.

The potential to constrict deeper structures may be used to the surgeon’s advantage in the context of a slowly oozing surgical wound, since this technique may indirectly ligate the culprit vessels. This should only be used in the event that the offending vessel is relatively small, since otherwise there is a significant risk that this indirect ligation will not be sufficiently resilient. Moreover, tying the suture too tightly may increase the risk of developing track marks or superficial necrosis.

This technique may elicit an increased risk of track marks, necrosis, and other complications when compared with techniques that do not entail suture material traversing the scar line, such as buried or subcuticular approaches. Therefore, sutures should be removed as early as possible to minimize these complications, and, as noted previously, consideration should be given to adopting other closure techniques in the event that sutures will not be able to be removed in a timely fashion.